|
Post by Duck(Yankees) on Nov 27, 2014 10:14:02 GMT -5
CAP CAP CAP THIS GENTLEMEN WILL BITE SOME OF US THIS YEAR, SO IT IS JUST A QUESTON TO YOU AS OWNERS ON WHAT YOU WANT TO DO, PLEASE REMEMBER THIS IS A TIME OF ESCALATING SALARIES SO IT TAKES MORE MONEY TO GET WHAT YOU AS OWNERS ARE LOOKING FOR IN A TEAM. PLEASE ALSO REMEMBER THAT NO MATTER WHAT ANNSWER IS PICKED UNLESS IT IS LEAVE IT ALONE THERE WILL BE MORE TO VOTE ON AND IT WILL BE EQUAL ACROSS THE BOARD, MEANING THAT ALL WILL BE EQUAL. WITH THAT SAID PLEASE VOTE.
THANKS DUCK AND JBACH
|
|
|
Post by Danny(Padres) on Nov 29, 2014 21:15:52 GMT -5
id like to leave it alone, but implement a cap hit or penalty of half the cap if a player is dropped. I think it would encourage more trading, and more research with free agents. I think this would add to bad teams, being able to spray a rebullid as cap room would be more important then.
|
|
|
Post by Mike(Red Sox) on Nov 29, 2014 22:40:34 GMT -5
Isn't the overarching goal of this league to mirror the experience of MLB GM's as closely as is practicable?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2014 8:57:30 GMT -5
Agree with Mike
|
|
|
Post by JBach(Brewers) on Nov 30, 2014 12:03:21 GMT -5
I agree with Mike but mlb cap is like 190 million but we do convert our caps. I would love to go to real salaries but feel it might hurt dsomee teams
|
|
|
Post by Kyle(Mets) on Dec 1, 2014 15:05:04 GMT -5
I voted to leave it as is. I think I agree with Danny that there should be some penalty for dropping a player. whether that is half of their salary or what I'm not sure, but with guaranteed contracts in MLB teams cant just release people at will.
|
|
|
Post by Tony(Nationals) on Dec 27, 2014 10:45:16 GMT -5
Caps will not change at all. This league was set up in the first place to run efficiently with the caps and the conversion chart.
|
|
|
Post by Tony(Nationals) on Dec 30, 2014 12:49:48 GMT -5
Let me rephrase this. As things rpogress through MLB and salaries rise will will take a vote every year to ssee if the league wants a small increase for our total cap. That seems to be the only real fair way of doing this.
|
|
|
Post by Mike(Red Sox) on Dec 30, 2014 13:04:57 GMT -5
In keeping with our goal of replicating the experience of a MLB GM as closely as possible, my suggestion would be to base our annual cap on the average MLB payroll.
Currently, our cap is set at $125 per team (though some teams have more or less as a result of trading for or away cap space). In 2014, the average MLB payroll was $115,132,013.23. Consequently, our cap was set at 108% of MLB's average payroll.
I suggest that we keep that ratio in place going forward. Each year, we can look back at the average MLB payroll and adjust our cap (up or down, rounded to a whole number) to maintain that 108% figure.
For example, if next year the average MLB payroll rose to $120,000,000.00, our cap would rise to $130. If the average MLB payroll rose to $135,000,000, our cap would rise to $146.
|
|
|
Post by Duck(Yankees) on Dec 30, 2014 13:08:59 GMT -5
If you had actual salaries I would agree with you mike, but with using a conversion chart I have to strongly disagree. hence why I put the poll up for cap and it got voted down.
|
|