|
|
Post by JBach(Brewers) on May 14, 2015 10:56:28 GMT -5
Not sure you quite understand kyle. You can bid on both in the first 24 hours to continue bidding. So you can place a bid on both add long as you have roster room and cap
|
|
|
|
Post by Cory(Rays) on May 14, 2015 15:02:57 GMT -5
no inseason bidding!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by JBach(Brewers) on May 15, 2015 4:12:05 GMT -5
ok cory explain how you would take care of some of these players that come up for bid now. are you gonna make them first come firat serve?? that way whoever is on the computer the most gets tose players? doesnt sound fair to me
|
|
|
|
Post by Bob(Royals) on May 21, 2015 8:39:50 GMT -5
Didn't inseason FA used to be on the waiver system based of finish the previous year? last place team waiver priority 1 first place team waiver priority 30. when a FA is selected you go to the bottom of the waiver list.
|
|
|
|
Post by Donald(Rangers) on May 21, 2015 22:02:04 GMT -5
Didn't inseason FA used to be on the waiver system based of finish the previous year? last place team waiver priority 1 first place team waiver priority 30. when a FA is selected you go to the bottom of the waiver list. I think this is the best option, but doing it on a weekly basis just like they do on ESPN. This way the worst teams have the ability to improve over the rich getting richer. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2015 8:23:56 GMT -5
so punish the good teams so they cant get better for the future.. makes sense LOL
|
|
|
|
Post by Donald(Rangers) on May 28, 2015 9:16:39 GMT -5
so punish the good teams so they cant get better for the future.. makes sense LOL NO, the MLB does not allow KC or ST.Louis the first options on any waiver players. They are last. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2015 8:29:55 GMT -5
A player can also opt to not play for a team in the majors.. we dont have that here.
|
|
